To be honest, I've seen people win Academy Awards who weren't half as good as Sheen was. But I would advise you to skip this unless you are a big Emilio Estavez fan, in which case this is a must see, or if you are a Charlie Sheen fan, and then it is worth seeing because this is one of his better performances-and it's amusing to see these guys in their bald domes and their side burns and authentic seventies attire. The students can see this as a film documenting the moral corruption of a nation following Vietnam and the Nixon administration, perhaps even anticipating the moral corruption we see today. #Hoover runabout vacuum movie#However, I wouldn't be surprised if someday in the distant future, long after I am gone, in some social science class at say Cal Berkeley this movie is played as augmenting an anthropological study of a certain segment of our population in the later part of the 20th century. Megan Ward had a chance in a supporting role here, but she failed miserably, possibly because how could she feel any connection with a role that made her the quasi-tolerant, quasi-suffering wife of a man who makes his living pandering to lust (and indulging his own) while smoking, drinking and snorting anything he can get his hands on? Not pretty. The movie moves right along and the degeneration of the brothers is well expressed. Charlie Sheen is very good and so is Estavez. On the other hand, there is a didactic tale here about how success corrupts and how sex, drugs and rock and roll-forget the rock and roll this is almost pure sex and drugs-how sex and drugs may lead you to make a movie called "Sodom and Gomorrah" which may suggest that you ought to be starring it in. #Hoover runabout vacuum free#But somebody else might say, why bother? Most critics and viewers would call this a prize turkey, but.but is there some redeeming social value? Charlie Sheen and Estavez star as the brothers Mitchell, two entrepreneurial guys who stumble from the free love scene of the sixties in San Francisco to the cash cow of the first widely distributed porn movies, including the infamous "Behind the Green Door." Maybe there is a kind of free speech angle here, with the porno boys fighting the good fight against censorship and Big Brother. I guess what he was thinking was this was a part of America from the sixties to the nineties in the twentieth century-this was the reality and let's tell the truth. You certainly can't make heroes of these guys. What was Emilio thinking? You can play it as tragedy. It doesn't take a genius to realize that a movie about two porn movie directors is not going to win any Academy Awards. A truly daring portrait of the early days of American pornography.Ĭustomer Review: Yes, it's rated X (or should be)Įmilio Estavez directed this, but one wonders why. Emilio Estevez and Charlie Sheen bring to the screen the critically-acclaimed true story of the Mitchell Brothers, the original San Francisco sex entrepreneurs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |